Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Nato or Mildot

  1. #1
    Inactive Member

    User Info Menu

    Default Nato or Mildot

    Apologies to Guido - I had phoned him and asked this question of him.

    What is the difference between the Nato reticule and the milldot one? (Besides the obvious visual difference) Which is better/more practical/acceptable etc?

    Ta
    ĪĪĪ

  2. #2
    Sharp Shooter
    The Professor

    User Info Menu

    Default

    If you drop me an e-mail (my address is in my profile I can send you a picture of the NATO pattern reticle.

    Dale
    Last edited by Dale; 20-10-10 at 11:04.
    ĪĪĪ

  3. #3
    Inactive Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    both were designed for 2 pourposes, range finding and multiple aiming points (to compensate for bullet drop/windage....etc).

    personally, i've only used mildots, but i don't use them for rangefinding. it's my view that essentially they are just as good as the other re range finding.......perhaps it might be easier with the NATO as it offers "dots" and various inter/line distances, specially designed for targets that's about on ave 1.8m high and 1/2m wide...........

    as for multiple aiming points, i found the MD reticle offers more points of aim on both axis.
    ĪĪĪ

  4. #4
    Marksman
    The Guru

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I prefer mil-dots....but both are ok if you are dialling in..
    ĪĪĪ

Similar Threads

  1. Big Nikko Nato RF reticle
    By Saxon in forum Optics • Sighting • Illumination
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 21-09-15, 11:10
  2. Nato or Mildot
    By JTK in forum Optics • Sighting • Illumination
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 10-06-08, 16:49
  3. Mildot VS Nato
    By Werdasnr in forum Optics • Sighting • Illumination
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 20-03-08, 21:10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •